Jan Wieck writes:
> There is no
> reason other than that we'll have more PL handlers to
> support,
... which is a pretty big reason ...
> why we shouldn't have two or three different
> procedural SQL dialects. All can coexist and only those used
> in your DB schema will get loaded.
Or you can make one PL support alternative, non-conflicting dialects.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter