Tom Lane writes:
> A different tack is to go ahead and make the change now, but try to
> ensure we won't have to change the coding again when we do the rest of
> the SQL protection model. Do you know what is still missing given this
> change?
I don't think this will end up being the user-visible interface. We
should have a view, perhaps as part of the standard information_schema,
that users can query for privilege information. So for now I'll leave the
old letters the way they are and just add a few new ones.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter