Re: AGAIN: still no answer ... peter, or anybody knowledgeable, please ....
От | Michael Stephenson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AGAIN: still no answer ... peter, or anybody knowledgeable, please .... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105081616310.18214-100000@tirin.openworld.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AGAIN: still no answer ... peter, or anybody knowledgeable, please .... (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: AGAIN: still no answer ... peter, or anybody knowledgeable,
please ....
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> The current CVS sources look wrong to me. It has: > > if (result != null) && ((org.postgresql.ResultSet)result.reallyResultSet()) > > Shouldn't this be: > > if (result != null && ((org.postgresql.ResultSet)result.reallyResultSet())) > > Not sure if the extra parens are needed for: > > if (result != null && ((org.postgresql.ResultSet)result).reallyResultSet()) > > Comments? The extra parenthesis are required (since java.sql.ResultSet doesn't have a method 'reallyResultSet()' which returns an object which can be succesfully cast as a 'org.postgresql.ResultSet), but I think it would be cleaner just to declare 'result' as 'org.postgresql.ResultSet' on line 27, that way none of the messy casts (of which there are 11) would be required.. Michael xxx
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: