Re: How robust is postgresql ?
От | Brett W. McCoy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How robust is postgresql ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0103071345410.15784-100000@chapelperilous.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How robust is postgresql ? ("Simon Crute" <Simon@geordie.demon.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: How robust is postgresql ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Simon Crute wrote: > We're writing an app in Perl and currently using Oracle as the backend > database (via the perl DBI) but due to the costs when we put this live we're > thinking of useing Postgresql. Good choice! Version 7.1, now in beta and due out very soon, has a lot of new stuff that is very smart and cool. > However we need to know how crash resistant Posgresql is. Oracle has the > "Archive log mode" which writes a log of everything that's casued the > database to change. This allows you to recoved it properly in the event of a > crash. > > Does Postgresql have anything simmilar ? I've read about Postgresql's "fsync > mode". Does this guarantee that the data is written to the disk properly and > that the in the even of a crash (such as power outage etc) the database will > still be correct ? 7.1 has write-ahead logging (WAL), which does what you are looking for. See http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/admin/wal.html The fsync mode also helps with data integiry, but it *really* slows down the system, unfortunately. > The other question is Backups. Is there anyway to take diferential backups ? > I.E do a full dump periodically, and then make diferential backups from time > to time (preferably to a differet box) You can do a database dump and back up the SQL generated, or do a filesystem backup. See http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/admin/backup.html for information on the specifics. -- Brett http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You can't mend a wristwatch while falling from an airplane.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: