Re: abstract data types?

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> None, I fear.  The stuff you are fooling with is leftover from the old
> PostQuel language.  Most of it is suffering from bit rot, because the
> developers' focus has been on SQL92 compliance for the last six or seven
> years.  I hadn't realized that SQL99 had caught up to PostQuel in this
> area ;-).  Sounds like we will have to dust off some of that stuff and
> get it working again.  No promises about timeframe, unless someone
> steps up to the plate to do the work...

What goes around comes around. :-)

-- Brett                                    http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
mixed emotions:Watching a bus-load of lawyers plunge off a cliff.With five empty seats.