Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation
От | Brett W. McCoy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101201631140.4421-100000@chapelperilous.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] re-instalation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > The problem with just moving your database to the new location is that > > there are location dependencies built into it when you use initdb to > > initialize it, so it's not reliable. > > AFAIK, there are *not* any location dependencies in a standard PG > database (other than path names associated with alternate database > locations, if you are so foolish as to use hard-wired alternate-location > pathnames). So in theory Martin should have been able to tar up the > entire $PGDATA tree and move it somewhere else. I'm not sure why he's > reporting a problem, but I don't think that's it. Ah, right... I misunderstood and thought he had also changed to a different version because of OS incompatilities. Never mind. :-) -- Brett http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vax Vobiscum
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: