Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON bug?
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0305211053310.14538-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON bug? (Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON bug?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: > Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > >> > >>I gather that to mean SELECT DISTINCT ON (*) , ... > >> > >>Is the syntax give by "\h select" wrong or am I misinterpreting it? > > > > > > That's a misinterpretation I'm afraid. There is no comma shown before the * > > that is not part of the expression for the DISTINCT ON. > > You mean "after the *" right? ;) No, I was refering to the syntax you'd pasted from psql: Syntax: SELECT [ ALL | DISTINCT [ ON ( expression [, ...] ) ] ] * | expression [ AS output_name ] [, ...] Here the '*' I mention is on the second line of the statement and specifies the returned columns. Before that point the only comma that can occur is within the brackets giving the expression(s) of the DISTINCT ON. Sorry for confusing you more. > > After looking at it again I see how I misunderstood the syntax... Easily done. -- Nigel J. Andrews
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: