Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?
От | Gavin Sherry |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0304301107330.5542-100000@linuxworld.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > I'm not an expert on signals, not even a novice, so I might be > > totally off base, but it seems like the Async Notification > > implementation does not scale. If it does not, does anyone have a > > solution for the problem of signalling a each event in a possibly > > very large set of events to a large number of clients? > > <brainfart_for_the_archives> Hrm.... I should see about porting > kqueue/kevent as a messaging buss for the listen/notify bits to > postgresql... that does scale and it scales well to tens of thousands > of connections a second (easily over 60K, likely closer to 1M is the > limit).... </brainfart_for_the_archives> Except that it is FreeBSD specific -- being system calls and all -- if I remember correctly. If you're going to move to a system like that, which is a good idea, best move to a portable system. Thanks, Gavin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: