Re: Prepared queries and ANALYZE
От | Gavin Sherry |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prepared queries and ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0304281532240.21086-100000@linuxworld.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prepared queries and ANALYZE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes: > > Looking through the query preparing and stats analyze code, I noticed that > > prepared queries using an analyzed table are not replanned. I imagine that > > some users of prepared queries would not want the above behaviour, plan > > stability etc, but surely others would. > > I didn't notice any discusion of this in the list archives. Any technical > > reasons why this shouldn't happen? > > Well, there are implementation reasons why it doesn't happen: there's no > infrastructure for determining which tables a prepared query depends on > nor for re-planning it if we did notice they'd changed. Yes. Speaking to Bruce on IRC I was reminded that prepared queries exist on a single backend which makes such this problem less pertinent than a general solution, which you mentioned. Gavin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: