Re: [GENERAL] problem with update rules on a view (ODBC)
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] problem with update rules on a view (ODBC) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0301130730260.626-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] problem with update rules on a view (ODBC) (Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] problem with update rules on a view (ODBC)
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org> writes: > > > >>I am trying to create a small applications using a PostgreSQL 7.2 database, > >>updated through ODBC from an OpenOffice form. > >>... > >>I tried my rules "by hand" in psql : the update works as advertised in the > >>docs. However, I noticed that updating the *real" table gives a message : > >>UPDATE 1 > >>after updating the table, while updating the view gives the message > >>UPDATE 0 > >>after "updating" the view (i. e. updating the underlying table). > > > > > > You can control this in 7.3 by adjusting the rule firing order (which > > you do by choosing the names you give to the rules); see > > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/rules-status.html > > Thanks a lot ! I will give it a shot. However, I'm a bit reluctant : my > test machine is Debian stable but with some unstable packages : it may > accept the (unstable) Postgres 7.3 package. My production machine, however > is Debian stable and has to remain so (therefore, no "official" 7.3 > packages) ... Word going around is that the new libc6 (2.3.x) has some > nasty problems (I've encountered some of them myself : some software > suddenly broken by unmet dynamic linking dependencies ...). Compiles fine on a server I did last week, and I even compiled it in the middle of a huge panic about building other software with interdependencies on the same box. Tests past, although I must admit to skipping the bigcheck due to the postgres install becoming the critical path on one of the things I was doing. > > > I am not sure there is any good workaround in 7.2. > > Aaaahhhh ... Now, I'll just have to nag Oliver Elphick into making his > Debian-stable-Woody PostgreSQL repository apt-get-able ... :-). I'm thinking now you are only looking for binary packages. Is building from source unacceptable or impossible? > Anyway, a big "Thank you" ! The "Open source" software, and especially the > Postgres team, proves abgain itself much more usable than commercial > solutions when it comes to support. -- Nigel J. Andrews
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: