Re: Memory leaks
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory leaks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0210231139570.6246-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory leaks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory leaks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> writes: > > > Interesting. Having not looked at memory management schemes used in the > > pl implementations, can you enlighten me by what you mean by "integrate > > the memory-context notion"? Does that mean they are not using > > palloc/pfree stuff? > > Not everywhere. plpgsql is full of malloc's and I think the other PL > modules are too --- and that's not to mention the allocation policies of > the perl, tcl, etc, language interpreters... I was going to make the suggestion that malloc et al. could be replaced with palloc etc but then that raises too many complications without just shooving everything into a long lived context anyway. Also I think we've got to rely on, i.e. it is sensible to do so, the underlying language handling memory correctly. Hmmm...there do seem to be a few mallocs in plpython.c . I haven't looked very closely but nothing jumped out at me as being obviously wrong from the grep output. -- Nigel J. Andrews
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: