Re: anoncvs and diff
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: anoncvs and diff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0210031707340.26902-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: anoncvs and diff (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: anoncvs and diff
Re: anoncvs and diff |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > > cvs diff -r HEAD pltcl.c > > > > gave me differences against revision 1.64 > > > > and cvs update pltcl.c > > > > said it was merging changes between 1.64 and 1.61 > > > > and a plain cvs diff now shows me differences against 1.64 > > > > I think this is probably just a short fall in my fairly basic knowledge of how > > cvs works. > > What does 'cvs log' say about the file, especially the top stuff? It gave me the log all the way up to the 1.64 revision with the REL7_3_STABLE label assigned to revision 1.64.0.2 Revision 1.64 apparently backing out my patch which made 1.63. I had a brain wave and did the cvs log command which was what lead me to try specifying revisions. As I say it looks like a lack of knowledge about how cvs works for these things. I always thought it worked like RCS and gave a diff against the latest checked in but obviously not. BTW, I've found Neil Conway's patch for this file, email dated 25th Sept., I can forward it or apply it and include the changes along with whatever I do for my next submission, which ever you'd prefer. I'd suggest it's easy to let me apply and submit it due to overlaps. -- Nigel J. Andrews
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: