Re: Different Port for PostgreSQL?
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Different Port for PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0209231948340.816-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Different Port for PostgreSQL? (dan radom <dan@radom.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ones got to question why you'd have the PostgreSQL port completely open on the external interface at all. You must know the IP address(es) of the external web servers so just enable traffic for them. As for doing the reject message: 1) if you haven't got a listener on a port the kernel's going to reject the connection attempt pretty quickly 2) wrap your DB starting and stopping commands with iptable manipulation to enable/disable the web server's traffic as appropiate On the whole the best solution is Dan's response. You'd manipulate the firewall rules separately to the DB scripts of course but then if you're starting and stopping the DB I see no reason to not require manual intervention in the firewall. -- Nigel J. Andrews On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, dan radom wrote: > wouldn't it make sense to use a lower end system as your iptables gw / fw? i mean hardware is cheap, and iptables hasno problems forwarding web traffic to a httpd on the iternal network that where postgres lives. why even open the databaseup to the general internet population when the httpd only needs to talk to it. > > dan > > * Dan Ostrowski (dan@triad-dev.com) wrote: > > Hello all... > > > > I am developing a databasing system that will be used localy, but in tandem with a hosted web server. > > > > As such, I will be implementing a local PostgreSQL server and connecting it to the internet. However, this machine (unfortunately ) will probably also have to run the firewall as well, but that's all it will be more than likely.. databaseand firewall. > > > > Ideally, I would be able to send a "REJECT" message ( via iptables ) if the connection is refused because the Databaseis down or somesuch, instead of just "DROP"ing the connection. This would speed up things for the web scripts whenthe DB is unreachable locally. However, port scans will then be able to easily figure out that I am running PostgreSQLon the standard port, presumably. > > > > Is there a way to run Postgre on some other non-standard port? Does it do well in this regard? How would i go aboutdoing that? > > > > I know it won't "hack proof" anything really, just make it a bit more confusing for anyone doing port scans on my machine. > > > > ideas? > > > > > > regards, > > dan > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: