Re: killing process question
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: killing process question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0209192136490.599-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: killing process question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Johnson, Shaunn" <SJohnson6@bcbsm.com> writes: > > --generally speaking, how long should this run? > > > (gdb) attach 3488 > > Attaching to program: /usr/bin/postgres, process 3488 > > Not very long --- it takes a couple seconds, for me, on a machine that's > not fast by today's standards. > > > --i know i should be patient, but i'm trying to figure > > --out if this should take more than 20 minutes or if > > --i've done something wrong. (OR, should that be postmaster > > --and not postgres in the above line?) > > postgres is correct. But are you sure that you are pointing to the same > postgres executable that the process is running? Perhaps gdb could get > confused if you point to the wrong version. Another shot in the dark - could the process have blocked the relevent signal (SIGTRAP) sent by the debugger? -- Nigel J. Andrews Director --- Logictree Systems Limited Computer Consultants
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: