Re: Open 7.3 items
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0208150015490.5375-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open 7.3 items (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I have no personal preference between period and @ or whatever. See if > > you can get some other votes for @ because most left @ when the ORDER BY > > idea came up from Marc. > > FWIW, I still lean to username@database, so I think we're roughly at a > tie. It would be good to get more votes ... Seeing as this is rumbling on I'll throw in my fraction of a vote. I too like the user@database form, partly because it 'reads'. On the other hand I can see the the reasons to like database.user and it does match the style of database.schema.object. Unfortunately for this second form, as '.' is a valid character in a database name then I can see this causing problems, especially with the behind the scenes combination of the two names. I don't see this problem with the '@' form because I can't see that character being used in a 'unqualified' user name. Hmmm...not sure that makes a terribly good arguement for my vote for 'user@db', is there a third choice for us confused folks to go for? A compromise: database@username ? [BTW, I did check and '@' seems to be a valid character in database and user names.] -- Nigel J. Andrews Director --- Logictree Systems Limited Computer Consultants
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: