Re: max relations in a single database
От | Ralph Graulich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max relations in a single database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0207211703160.1804-100000@shauny.shauny.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max relations in a single database (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: max relations in a single database
Re: max relations in a single database |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom, referring to your other mail: I did a "make distclean", reran "configure" again, edited the pg_config.h and patched the pl_funcs.c again. I think this is even more strict than doing "make clean all". Checking the local machine with memtest and did a RAID check on the volumes, no errors were found. I can't check the remote machine right now, as I cannot safely reboot, as the machine has no serial console. Concerning reindexing the system catalogue, I did this as describes in the REINDEX manpage, which was very helpful. So I reindexed in "postgres single user mode" (so to say) and it didn't complain about anything unusual. I pg_dumpall'ed the database, did initdb just to be on the safe side and recreated everything. While importing the dump file I get the following message on my logfile: RTERangeTablePosn: RTE not found (internal error) I traced that back to a CREATE VIEW statement: CREATE VIEW horse_exported_imported_by_year_country AS . . . If I copy'n'paste this definition by hand it tells me that it truncates the identifier: NOTICE: identifier "horse_exported_imported_by_year_country" will be truncated to "horse_exported_imported_by_year" Can this cause any error as listed above? Kind regards ... Ralph ...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: