Re: tcpip_socket vs -i
От | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tcpip_socket vs -i |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0202241718470.7686-100000@antimony.cs.pitt.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | tcpip_socket vs -i ("Robert Treat" <robertt@auctionsolutions.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
The .conf file is not read automagically as far as I know. You need to restart pg to reread it. So any changes made afterstarting pg, really have not effect until the next time you restart it. cheers, --t. On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > I'm trying to find out the true behavior of postgres in regards to accepting > tcpip socket connections. According to the documentation, I should be able > to start postmaster with just "pg_ctl start" then specify tcpip_socket = on > (or possibly tcpip_socket = true, I tried both) in postgresql.conf and have > tcp_ip socket connections working, however after a multitude of different > attempts I found no way to get tcpip sockets to work unless I started the > postmaster with -i. I understand that the command line options would > override the conf file in cases of conflict, but does the mere omission > of -i override any attempts to use sockets otherwise? I would hope that not > specifying -i would allow me to turn socket connections on and off via the > conf file, without a restart of the database, but what is happening in > practice seems to be going against what is in the docs. Anyone know for > sure? > > Robert Treat > Auction Management Solutions, Inc. > Tampa, FL > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: