Re: \df+ and pg_proc query
От | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos |
---|---|
Тема | Re: \df+ and pg_proc query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0107131023190.9097-100000@aluminum.cs.pitt.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: \df+ and pg_proc query ("Richard Huxton" <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: \df+ and pg_proc query
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Richard Huxton wrote: > From: "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" <thalis@cs.pitt.edu> > > > I assume that there is in fact a difference between doing: > > > > \df+ <func_name> > > > > and: > > > > select oid,proname,prosrc from pg_proc where proname='func_name'; > > > > because I have a plpgsql function for a trigger, which I can see with the > second method (the select...) but not with the first method (the \df+ ). Is > it not possible to have the \df actually show up all functions? > > Start psql with -E and then do \df+ to see what query PG actually uses (this > works for any \command) I know that, but the question was: how come the \df doesn't show the plpgsql functions? Shouldn't it? cheers, thalis > > - Richard Huxton > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: