Re: Buggy SELEC ... FROM UPDATE ?
От | Helge Bahmann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buggy SELEC ... FROM UPDATE ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0104101731180.13990-100000@lothlorien.stunet2.tu-freiberg.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Buggy SELEC ... FROM UPDATE ? (Patrice Espié <patrice.espie@univ-lyon2.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Patrice Espié wrote: > > > Sure, I want to release it : the other users MUST be free to go away > instead > > > of being locked if they try to lock anything already locked > > A solution I have implemented once is to use an application-side timer > > to cancel the request after a certain timeout; ugly, but doable. What > > interface to postgres do you use? > Doable... > I use ODBC under Windows, but why not the C or C++ interface ? I will use > the most efficient (if I can decide which one...) uhh... I know nothing about Windows, but on Unix and libpq you would simply use alarm(timeout) to initiate the timer and sigaction(SIGALRM,...) to install a handler for the timer event which can in turn call PQrequestCancel; I guess Windows and ODBC can't be too different, but you better ask someone who knows Windows a bit better note that the current transaction is in 'aborted' state when you cancel a request, so you will have to "rollback" and "begin" a new one before sending any other queries hope that helps
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: