Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
От | Cedar Cox |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0101190058570.5197-100000@nanu.visionforisrael.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ... (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > okay, so far, its all been positive feedback on this, so I'm going to go > ahead with it ... with one slight change ... > > when we did the php list, I did it as: > > pgsql-php@postgresql.org -and- comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.php > > that way, for email purposes, the address was shorter, less to type in ... > > I'd like to do the same with the jdbc and odbc lists, unless anyone has an > objection to typing 11 characters less in an email address? :) > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > > > I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list info I > > scan and delete. Sounds logical. Sounds good to me.. and if for some reason someone doesn't want the split, they can simply subscribe to all three lists, which isn't a big deal. With that done, they still get everything, just with different addresses, which would be good for filtering/sorting. ..and dropping '-interfaces' sounds fine, but really doesn't make any difference to me. -Cedar
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: