Re: RPM install weirdness & BugreportPage Bug
| От | Thomas Linden |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RPM install weirdness & BugreportPage Bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0011022238400.17692-100000@people.consol.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: RPM install weirdness & BugreportPage Bug (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 yes, you are right, 6.3.2 was installed (which I never knew!) and contained that postgresql-clients package. After removing the old packages, everything worked very well. Thanks a lot for the help! regards, Thomas - -- => PGP key: http://daemon.de/key.txt => "Experience is what you got when => you did not get what you wanted." On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Lamar Owen wrote: > Thomas Linden wrote: > > I suggest a little bit more investigation and testing before publishing > > rpm packages, a rpm package must be installable unless it cannot find a > > required package. if this is the case, then this package must be > > You must put all the RPM's on the same command line invocation, or it > won't work. There are circular dependencies in the old packaging, which > cannot be rid of unless you upgrade all at once. > > Although, you may still get problems with the postgresql-data package -- > like Thomas said, you may be better off dumping your data then > uninstalling the old RPM's, and then installing the new. > > Are you running RedHat 6.x? RedHat 6.0 shipped PostgreSQL 6.4.2, RH 6.1 > shipped 6.5.2, and 6.2 shipped 6.5.3. RedHat 7 shipped 7.0.2. RedHat > 5.2 was the last RedHat release that shipped 6.3.2. > -- > Lamar Owen > WGCR Internet Radio > 1 Peter 4:11 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6Ad9Vi8dcrd1c6OsRAit5AJ9pSGDWisc8vHgxXr6q98jgHqXnEwCgzqCX cqT7qZDtAcisz0+dDLiz75Q= =FOpR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: