Selects on tables with cidr type primary keys are broken
От | Lennert Buytenhek |
---|---|
Тема | Selects on tables with cidr type primary keys are broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010151654310.2130-100000@mara.math.leidenuniv.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Selects on tables with cidr type primary keys are broken
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
============================================================================ POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE ============================================================================ Your name : Lennert Buytenhek Your email address : buytenh@gnu.org System Configuration --------------------- Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : Intel Pentium II Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : Red Hat Linux 6.2 (custom 2.2.16 kernel) PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.0): PostgreSQL-7.0.2 Compiler used (example: gcc 2.8.0) : Binary RPM distribution for Red Hat Please enter a FULL description of your problem: ------------------------------------------------ Selects on tables with cidr type primary keys are broken. Please describe a way to repeat the problem. Please try to provide a concise reproducible example, if at all possible: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Behold: <quote> test=# \d jobschedule Table "jobschedule" Attribute | Type | Modifier -----------+---------+---------- prefix | cidr | not null interval | integer | Index: jobschedule_pkey test=# select * from jobschedule; prefix | interval ----------------+---------- 132.229.230/24 | 2592000 132.229.231/24 | 2592000 132.229.232/24 | 2592000 132.229.12/24 | 2592000 132.229.50/24 | 2592000 132.229.52/24 | 2592000 132.229.93/24 | 2592000 132.229.95/24 | 2592000 (8 rows) test=# explain select * from jobschedule where prefix='132.229.230/24'; NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: Index Scan using jobschedule_pkey on jobschedule (cost=0.00..8.14 rows=10 width=16) EXPLAIN test=# select * from jobschedule where prefix='132.229.230/24'; prefix | interval --------+---------- (0 rows) </quote> If I recreate the table without prefix being a primary key, the selects are planned as sequential scans and magically start working again. If you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Eeeh.. not really. I haven't really had time yet to delve into the PostgreSQL codebase.... :(
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: