Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL
От | Ian Turner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0009021817420.4481-100000@crafter.house обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL (Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL
Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > From 7.1 on the system will try to compress all types > internally stored as variable length (char(), varchar(), text > and some more). So the real amount of bytes for a char(188) > will be "at maximum 192 - probably less". Don't variable-length records incur a performance overhead? In this case, ought I be able to specify the length for a record if I know ahead of time it will be the same in every case? :o Ian Turner -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5sabgfn9ub9ZE1xoRAhayAKCwMjh/5tYlg8zZiAimJlgFSfCLsQCghBce Gxx6X8sSwIACIHvdbxBsgGQ= =bogc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: