Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan
От | Tiago Antão |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0008211319340.24628-100000@eros.si.fct.unl.pt обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi! On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote: > And predictability is GOOD ;) > > I would even suggest that PG would warn about or even refuse to run > queries > that have both nextval and curval of the same sequence inside them > (and pre-evaluate nextval) as only that case has _any_ predictability. Isn't the problem more general than just nextval? Any user defined function with side-effects would be a problematic one... plus a user defined function might not be constant: select ... from ... where x in (select side_effects(x) ...) On correlated subqueries there is no guarantee of being constant. In Prolog, which is a declarative language with some similarities to relational algebra the ideia is: "if you use predicates with side effects, then you're on your own". Tiago PS - Apologies for any irrelevant comment, I'm just starting to look to pg code.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: