Re: Date or Documentation bug?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Date or Documentation bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0006171326130.348-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Date or Documentation bug? ("Mitterwald, Holger" <mittehlg@coi.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Mitterwald, Holger writes: > I am not shure if I discovered a Date or a Documentation bug.... The > Manpage says if postgres is started with the option "-e" it uses > european date-style in the format "dd-mm-yyyy". But this only takes > effekt if I select datestyle=Postgres instead of the default "ISO". > With Datestyle=ISO it is always "yyyy-mm-dd", no matter if I choose US > or European style. With this behavior the postgres option "-e" does > rather make any sense to me. The documentation is kind of unclear at that point. The European/NonEuropean option (-e) controls 1) Whether the month is before the day or vice versa in the 'SQL' and 'Postgres' styles. 2) How ambiguous date input (e.g., 01/02/99) is to be interpreted regarding month before day. It does not affect the output of the ISO format, since the ISO format is fixed. > P.S.: Is there a way to change the Datestyle to Postgres without a > SQL-Statement, e.g. ENV-Variable or config-file? PGDATESTYLE environment variable. Config file I'm working on. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: