Re: Sequencing Problem in Transaction..
От | Bhuvan A |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sequencing Problem in Transaction.. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.20.0202121909070.7267-100000@Larry.bks обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sequencing Problem in Transaction.. ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sequencing Problem in Transaction..
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Feb 12, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Ummm...this is not a bug - it is utterly essential that sequences are not > rolled back!!! > > Think about this: > > Sequence counter is 9 > Transaction 1 gets sequence no. 10 > Transaction 2 gets sequence no. 11 > transaction 1 rolls back, sequence no. reset to 9 > Transaction 3 gets sequence number 10 > Transaction 4 gets sequence number 11 - BAM!!! > Good and Thankx!!! Regards, Bhuvaneswar. > Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Bhuvan A > > Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2002 1:26 PM > > To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org > > Subject: [SQL] Sequencing Problem in Transaction.. > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > In postgresql 7.1, there is a problem in sequence. > > > > While rollbacking in transaction mode, the sequences are not actually > > getting rolled back. This problem is still there in 7.2, it seems! > > > > When they planned to fix this? Any idea? > > > > With Regards, > > Bhuvaneswaran. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > >
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: