Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
От | Clark C. Evans |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.9912252130330.11219-100000@cauchy.clarkevans.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Future of PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as > > > we become more popular? > > > > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility. > > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins. > Anything else? How about an SQL*Net listener... this would make PostgreSQL plug-n-play. It could even be a proprietary product, thus allowing VC's to fund it. It's a bit hard to justify changing ODBC settings on 30+ apps on a few (hundred) thousand PC workstations; some with hardcoded ODBC "ORA7.DLL" settings... Why? Oracle is going to be shutting down Oracle 7 support soon, forcing the upgrade to Oracle 8. This will leave hundreds (thousands accross the industry?) of applications stranded, and not alot of money to re-write/re-deploy/re-test them. Just a thought... at every big company I've been with, this has been a sore spot. It could also potentially be a good consulting revenue stream for Marc's group. Best, Clark
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: