Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time
| От | |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.9912011817550.9191-100000@picasso.realtyideas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
no, you won't ;-) further testing indicates that current_stamp like current, instead of now/now(). also, I remembered (I tried to check the archive, but failed) now() should not be use in where clause, cos it will hurt performance. Kai On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Ed Loehr ha scritto: > > > > > Just curious: anyone have any comment on any practical differences between now() and CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, which seemsto work > > > the same? > > > > > > > I think it is the same function, both of them return the current date and time. > > > > now() should be the internal postgreSQL function. > > and CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is the exact SQL-92 syntax > > I am changing my book to use CURRENT_TIMESTAMP rather than now(). > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle > maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > > ************ >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: