Re: [GENERAL] Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.9911291738440.19958-100000@picasso.realtyideas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++ (Ian Phillips <ian@comodo.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
PL/pgsql ADN PL/tcl is safer -- that is the OFFICIAL reason, tho the real reason may be comvenience. As for PL/pgsql and PL/tcl: I asked before, no answer. I guess it is portablility and existing codes. If you are a hero, use tcl, if not, use pl/pgsql. Kai On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Ian Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, you wrote: > > > > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:19:53 -0600 (CST) > > From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net> > > Subject: PL/pgsql or C/C++ > > > > This is a general question expecting general answers. I've read the > > documentation concerning triggers and functions, as well as the > > documentation on the different languages you can use for driving these > > triggers and functions. Aside from portability and the lack of having > > to explicitly compiling a C/C++ library, what advantages does PL/pgsql > > have over C/C++ or even PL/tcl? > > > > ^chewie > > > > Ease of use is probably the biggest plus. For running a 'quick and dirty' > trigger, it's a lot easier than compiling a C library or (in my case) learning > TCL. I suppose if you already know TCL, there isn't that much point. > > -- > Ian Phillips > ian@comodo.net > > "The Z80 - The Chip of the Seventies! Today!" > > ************ >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: