Re: [INTERFACES] problem with getBytes
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] problem with getBytes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.9911232041380.711-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] problem with getBytes ("Rafal Piotrowski (CSCS)" <Rafal.Piotrowski@CSCS.CH>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Rafal Piotrowski (CSCS) wrote: > Peter Mount wrote: > > > > > One more thing, setBytes method, does work, but only if the array of > > > bytes is not too big. (I don't know the exact size) :-( > > > > You may need to look at the LargeObject api, which is additional to the > > JDBC api. > > > > I don't want to use the LargeObject API, because I want to make my > application easy to port to different DBMS. And since LargeObject API is > not in for example in JDBC for mySQL, I don't want to use it. Thats a good point. > Anyway, I have used it before, and I have noticed the following thing: > when I store an object, and then try to rewrite the object (the new > object is bigger), nothing huppens. Well, the size of the object > changes, but when I retreive the data from the object, it is unchanged > :-? (i.e. I get the original object, the first one stored). > I thing that is odd. Something simmilar huppens, when I reduce the size > of the object and write it. Except that the size of the LargeObject does > not change, it staies the same, as it was. That sounds like a problem in the backend - unless a new lo is created, but your code is refering to the old one. -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgresJava PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: