Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.9910030715590.366-100000@peter-e.yi.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 2, Tom Lane mentioned: > Nope: no sub-selects in target list. > > I'm hoping to fix that soon, but if you want psql to continue to work > with pre-6.6 backends then you'll have to use a different approach. Question number one is: Do I? Yeah, okay :) Anyway, I thought wouldn't a more, um, user-friendly error message like ERROR: Subselects are not allowed in target list. be more desirable than ERROR: flatten_tlistentry: Cannot handle node type 108 If _I_ read the latter I can at least suspect that there is a problem in the query tree, but Joe User that just learned about inodes the other day is going to think his system is broken is all sorts of ways. Another example is FATAL 1: SetUserId: user 'joeschmoe' is not in 'pg_shadow' clearly not as nice as FATAL ERROR: 'joeschmoe' is not a valid database user. (Also, if you want to be really secure you wouldn't give them the information that 'joeschmoe' is not a valid user but rather just return "Permission denied" or "Authentication failed". -- cf. login(1) ) I think that ought to be a TODO item, right above * Allow international error message support and add error codes Perhaps it's even the same in essence. -- Peter Eisentraut - peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: