Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Goran Thyni wrote:

> Why not put what you have in the CVS? The files in src/corba is pretty
> old. I have planned to get into this because did some coding around
> the FE/BE-protocol and would love to see a clean object-based
> communication in PgSQL instead the current one. Let us see what you
> have got and what is still missing in more lightweight alternatives to
> MICO.

What I have is not worth putting in the CVS, plus it is not finalized, nor
is it working in any real way. (It's just a set of IDL files, attached.)

The most important thing we need support for is CORBA 2.2 itself, which
when I started this, was only supported by CORBA. Also, I would like
support for the LifeCycle service (I think), the Security service, the
Transaction service, and maybe others I can't think of right now.

Taral