Re: Are globally defined constants possible at all ?
От | Darren Ferguson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are globally defined constants possible at all ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.10206071748430.16196-100000@thread.crystalballinc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Are globally defined constants possible at all ? ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Check can be used in the following way status VARCHAR(32) DEFAULT 'new' NOT NULL CHECK(status IN ('new','read','deleted')), HTH Darren Ferguson On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:36:35PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > > > > > I am in the exact same position. I have a number of things which are > > > essentially enumerations. Since PostgreSQL does not support an enumeration > > > type (MySQL does, but then it doesn't have a proper boolean type), I have a > > > > Why don't you use a CHECK contraint? That's the standard way to do > > it. > > I wonder if you could explain how to use CHECK for this please? I'm having a > little trouble thinking in that manner but then I've only seen and used the > table associating name and value method before and so am a little biased. > > > -- > Nigel J. Andrews > Director > > --- > Logictree Systems Limited > Computer Consultants > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: