Re: Confusing terminology
От | Roderick A. Anderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Confusing terminology |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.10201190951590.17332-100000@tincan.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Confusing terminology ("Arguile" <arguile@lucentstudios.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Confusing terminology
Re: Confusing terminology |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Arguile wrote: > Roderick A. Anderson writes: > > > ERROR: Relation 'foo' already exists > > > > Can a table named foo and a view named foo exist in the same database? > > > No. There's no reasonable way for the server to know which you mean when you > execute a statement. This applies to tables, views, sequences, etc. It was a rhetorical question (aka. smart-ass). My point was a table, view, sequence, and their friends are all relations. Or at least to my understanding the table and view are relations. And therefore Relation 'foo' already exists makes sense to me. Best, Rod -- Let Accuracy Triumph Over Victory Zetetic Institute "David's Sling" Marc Stiegler
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: