Re: Operator Precedence problem?
От | Jesus Aneiros |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Operator Precedence problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.10008121656570.22653-100000@jagua.cfg.sld.cu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Operator Precedence problem? (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
The ANSI/ISO standard specifies that NOT has the highest priority, then AND and finally OR. -- Jesus Aneiros Sosa mailto:aneiros@jagua.cfg.sld.cu http://jagua.cfg.sld.cu/~aneiros On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Philip Warner wrote: > > I have a peculiar problem that I can't reproduce on a trivial database: > > select product, priority, count(*) as completed from issue > where > product = 'DIS' > and create_date < '1-Aug-2000' and finish_date >= '1-Aug-2000' or > finish_date is null > group by product, priority; > > This produces a list of all products - not just 'DIS'. If I put the last > two clauses in parnthesis, then it works as expected: > > select product, priority, count(*) as completed from issue > where > product = 'DIS' > and create_date < '1-Aug-2000' and (finish_date >= '1-Aug-2000' or > finish_date is null) > group by product, priority; > > Which makes me think that the precedence of 'or' is not what I expected. Is > this a feature? If so, the fact that I get precisely the opposite behaviour > in simple test databases must be a bug, I think. > > Any help or explanation would be appreciated... > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Philip Warner | __---_____ > Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ > (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ > Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ > Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | > Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| > | --________-- > PGP key available upon request, | / > and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/ >
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: