Re: 4 billion record limit?
От | Martin A. Marques |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 4 billion record limit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.10007280731530.19178-100000@math.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 4 billion record limit? (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > FWIW, I checked into MySQL, and as far as I can tell, they have nothing > > like this implicit 4 billion transactional "limit". So maybe competitive > > spirit will drive the postgres hackers to fix this problem sooner than > > later. ;-) > > We have *never* had a report of someone pushing this 4GB limit, and > theoretical problems usually go into the long-term development plan, not > in the "OHMYGODITSBROKEN" list. I'm not sure about MySQL not haveing the 4 Billion limit. As far as I know, Informix has (in it's 7.x versions) the 4 billion limit with the INTEGERS. Informix 9.x has added other data types, like an 8 byte INTEGER. Working on 64bit Solaris, but don't know which is the real limit. Maybe some day I'm make a small program to see if I can fill the column. ;-) Saludos... ;-) "And I'm happy, because you make me feel good, about me." - Melvin Udall ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués email: martin@math.unl.edu.ar Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/ Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: