Re: USMARC and postgresql?
От | Brett W. McCoy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: USMARC and postgresql? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.10005090920500.17232-100000@chapelperilous.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: USMARC and postgresql? (Andrew Sullivan <sullivana@bpl.on.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > BLOBs. It's a pain, though, because building the indices against the > catalogue is difficult. I think, actually, that the PICK-based spproach is > better, but PICK is going away. Anyway, you likely need to talk to someone > about BLOBs. I can't help, sorry. The MARC format is really intended to be used in a full-text search environment, such as the old online systems like Dialog or Lexix-Nexis use (although they don't use MARC specifically). They all predate SQL and mapping one onto the other is not an easy task. It's easy to go from a SQl database to one of the variable-length (or 80 column card image) text-formats, but not the other way around unless you are into doing some text-processing programming. Brett W. McCoy http://www.chapelperilous.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If the very old will remember, the very young will listen. -- Chief Dan George
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: