Re: [GENERAL] Maximum Records
| От | Brett W. McCoy |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Maximum Records |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.04.9905270759130.23702-100000@dragosani.lan2wan.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Maximum Records ("Dannie M Stanley" <dan@spinweb.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Dannie M Stanley wrote:
> I am currently considering using PostgreSQL to facilitate a large database.
> I need to know if there is a maximum number of records. Or if there is a
> point at which the performance is severely cut. The database that I need to
> implement will start at around 30,000 records. If anyone could point me to
> performance comparisons or documentation on such information I would
> appreciate it.
You should have no problems. I have a database with 7 or 8 tables, most
of which have over a million rows. One table has over 2 million rows.
Performance is pretty good, especially if you index things properly. I
have a web interface to this data, via PHP3, and it takes only a few
minutes to run the queries form the web page and generate statistical
data. It's only running under Linux on a PPro 200, with 128 megs of RAM.
Brett W. McCoy
http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dinner suggestion #302 (Hacker's De-lite):
1 tin imported Brisling sardines in tomato sauce
1 pouch Chocolate Malt Carnation Instant Breakfast
1 carton milk
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: