Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.04.9902071318280.553-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0 (Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Hannu Krosing wrote: > Thomas Reinke wrote: > > > > I may be dating myself really badly here, but isn't there a hard limit > > on > > the file system at 2Gig? I thought the file size attribute in Unix is > > represented as a 32 bit signed long, which happens to be a max value > > of 2147483648. If I'm right, it means the problem is fundamentally > > with the file system, not with PostGres, and you won't solve this > > unless the os supports larger files. > > There is logic insid PostgreSQL to overflof to nex file at 2GB, but > apparently this is currently broken. > > AFAIK, there are people working on it now Yes, me ;-) I have an idea where the failure is occuring, but I'm still testing the relavent parts of the code. -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgresJava PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: