Re: [INTERFACES] Java, JDBC & CORBA (fwd)
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Java, JDBC & CORBA (fwd) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.04.9811301515390.831-100000@taer.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Java, JDBC & CORBA (fwd) ("Andrew R. Jackson" <ajackson@dezines.com>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Andrew R. Jackson wrote: > First, let me preface my answer to say that the main reason I am > subscribed to this list is to read Peter's, and occassionally others', > answers, comments, etc about using JDBC with Postgres. which was why I was asking on Friday why my posts weren't appearing on the list - now solved. > To answer Peter's question, personally I would prefer two drivers, > each separate. The reason for this is that I don't want a Makefile > deciding which one (1) will be compiled and installed when I have two > (2) different versions of Java on most of the systems I work on (most > have 3 Javas, actually). I'd hate to be locked into using one driver > version, and thus one Java version for Postgres stuff, because the > Makefile only detected one of the Javas (which would be the 1.1.x one > for now and some long time into the future). I want to choose. I want > to be able to develop a Java 1.1.x solution and a Java 1.2 solution, > not either/or. Which was why I posted the query. I wanted to find out what everyone thought (see the other reply). > Now, what really matters is good install instructions. If the > instructions included ways to solve problems like the one above, then > that's best and I don't care. Nothing beats good, copius, verbose, > clear, well-maintained docs. :) There's a lot of documentation in the 6.4 docs directory (can't remember how many pages, but before formatting, it was about 70 pages?). -- Peter Mount, IT Section petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk Anything I write here are my own views, and cannot be taken as being the official words of Maidstone Borough Council
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: