Re: [SQL] Performance

What, if anything, are you using as an index.

I have 1,400,000 entries (200MB) I'm inserting into a database.  Radius
detail files as a matter of fact.  Apart from COPY taking forever to load
that (probably due to my several indexes), it seems the select is VERY
slow.  Any tips?

How CPU intensive is a select?

Jason

---
Jason Slagle
Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
- raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172

On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Tim Perdue wrote:

> It searches the bodies, not the subjects or authors. I don't see why anyone
> needs to search for a particular author. But if it's requested enough, it
> would be trivial to implement.....
>
> Tim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>
> To: perdue@raccoon.com <perdue@raccoon.com>
> Cc: pgsql-sql@hub.org <pgsql-sql@hub.org>
> Date: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance
>
>
> >Thus spake Tim Perdue
> >> Some time back I sent out a message asking if PGSQL would be able to
> handle
> >> my mailing list archive at http://www.geocrawler.com/ , and whether it
> would
> >> scale up to 100MB.
> >
> >Cool.  We now have a searchable archive for PostgreSQL.  However, I
> >tried a search and it didn't seem to work.  In pgsql-hackers I entered
> >"niladic" (I tried "Niladic" just in case) and it failed to find any
> >messages, even though I could see a few on the list of recent messages.
> >Any ideas?
> >
> >--
> >D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
> >http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
> >+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.
>
>