New to PostgreSQL, is this a DoS?
От | dkelson-list-pgsql-hackers@inconnect.com |
---|---|
Тема | New to PostgreSQL, is this a DoS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.02A.9811161844310.424-100000@brookie.inconnect.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
more... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 22:55:04 -0700 (MST) From: Dax Kelson <dkelson-list-pgsql-admin@inconnect.com> To: pgsql-admin@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] New to PostgreSQL, is this a DoS? On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Dax Kelson wrote: > Is this a denial of service? A remote user can connect and create as many > phantom tables as they want which could possibly interfere with normal > operation? How would the admin even know the name of the table to drop? > > If I connect locally as user "postgres" and I can successfully create and > see the table. > > Is it normal behaviour that user "postgres" must first create the tables > for them to be useable? After more testing I found futher strange behavior. After locally user "postgres" creates any table in the database, any remote users can then create any new table, and it isn't "phantom" (can see it/use it). Is this desirable and/or expected behavior? It doesn't seem to me that it is.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: