Re: PostgreSQL Portable Runtime (was Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL)
От | Howie |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Portable Runtime (was Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.991231004922.1580U-100000@rabies.toodarkpark.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL Portable Runtime (was Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL) (Robert <robert@robert.cz>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Robert wrote: > Hi, > > one of the important factors that contributed to the popularity and success of > Apache, Perl, Tcl/Tk etc. was their platform independence. I'm big fan of Unix (and > even bigger of Postgres ;-), but BeOS, MacOS X, even Win2000 all look quite > interesting too and I don't want to tie myself to just one platform. MacOS X has a Unix core ( Mach 3.0 + FreeBSD ). a few people are looking into a port to MacOS X DP2 (Developer Preview, heavily NDA'ed), but they're not sure if the guts are 'feature frozen' yet. MacOS X CR1 (Customer Release) supposidly ships ~feb 2k. id expect that the port would be relatively painless, but i'm not 100% positive. Mach would be The Big Hurdle (no pun intended) in getting pgsql to work right on the MacOS X/OS X Server platform. David Wetzel ( www.turbocat.de ) has a working EOAdaptor for MacOS X Server, OPENSTEP/Mach, and OPENSTEP/NT. ive been using it for quite a few internal projects under MacOS X Server. works great. > [SNIP] --- Howie <caffeine@toodarkpark.org> URL: http://www.toodarkpark.org "I've learned that you cannot make someone love you. All you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: