Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
От | Karel Zak - Zakkr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.991227123408.6398C-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL (Howie <caffeine@toodarkpark.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Howie wrote: > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as > > > > we become more popular? > > > > > > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility. > > > > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are > > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins. > > Anything else? > > tablespace support ( which isnt a trivial task ), groups ( pgsql has this > sort of functionality already, but i dont think its to the extent that > Oracle does ), some additional grants ( 'grant connect to' ), 'alter table > <table> add constraint <constraint definition>'... > > tablespace support would put pgsql soooo far ahead of most other rdbmses. Yes. A tablespace is good feature for robus SQL engine. And (IMHO): - raw i/o device storage manager - replication - privilege for columns, lock - better speed, speed ... and speed :-) - on-the-fly backup (from any logs) Karel
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: