Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report
От | Jose' Soares Da Silva |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.980603105352.745B-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, David Hartwig wrote: > > > > O.S.: We choose Linux for his proved reliability. > > *quiet snicker* If I understand, this mean incredibility. We are using Linux since 1994 and we are satisfied. ;-) > > > 2. As PostgreSQL doesn't allow an "ORDER BY" on columns not > > > included in the target list of the "SELECT", (I know that it is > > > SQL/92 standard, but IMO it's a fool thing), therefore, is not possible > > > to have the "dynaset "sorted for any field that is different from > > > the key (in our case the useless OIDs). > > > > > > > This fix is in alpha and will be in the 6.4 release. I do not know when > > 6.4 is slated for release, but I am willing to send you a patch if it is > > critical for you to proceed. > > 6.4 is slated for Oct 1st...we had thought Sep 1st, except that, > being the tail end of the summer, alot of ppl tend to be in limbo Thank you, Jose'
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: