Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000502230853.28206B-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes: > > The chunk header must be relevant and same for all allocation methods and > > must be independent on AllocSel (aset.c) code. Now, it is not. Am I right? > > Right. Actually it would work to have additional data before the > standard link-to-context-plus-chunk-size fields, if a particular method > really needed more per-chunk data. But I doubt we'd ever need that. The chunk: +--------------------+----------------------+-------------------+ | depend-header | standard-header | data.............| +--------------------+----------------------+-------------------+ ^ ^ ^ | | | | | pointer to chunk | | | begin of standard chunk header |particular method header, begin of thisheader is unknown for common routines. IMHO in standard chunk header not must be chunk size. If something needs chunk size it cat use depend-header. It will very nice :-) Karel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: