Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000406201231.6858A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Since you've conveniently made a post that reached my mailbox right after > > a query from someone working on our toolkit port from Oracle to PG, did you > > know that in Oracle to_char formatting chars don't have to be upper case? > > > > In other words something like "to_char(sysdate, 'yyyy-mm-dd')" formats > > sysdate rather than ignore the formatting characters. Turns out the > > toolkit we're porting from Oracle almost always uses upper case, but > > not always and one of our gang just ran into this earlier this morning > > while porting over one of the toolkit module... > > Doesn't the upper/lower affect how the result displays. I think that is > a cool effect. Thanks Don. I tomorrow check it and comperate it with Oracle and if is here a problem I fix it. In stable 7.0 it will right. PG's to_char() is based on upper case. Hmm, but it is not easy, it must be case sensitive for some format-pictures (like to_char(now(), 'Day') and for to_char(now(), 'yyyy') is upper/lower without effect. I fix it and add this feature to internal to_char's parser. Karel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: