seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed problem
От | Terry Mackintosh |
---|---|
Тема | seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.981104214017.13056A-100000@terry1.acun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Speed problem (Tony Reina <tony@nsi.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed problem
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hi Tony and all Well, first I want to say that none of my databases are bigger then a few meg of data, so I may not be the most experianced here. That said ... On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Tony Reina wrote: > Terry Mackintosh wrote: > > > Note, with a table that big your swap space should be on a physically > > differant hard drive (from the db) so that the db and the swap are not > > always fighting for the use of the drive heads. > > > > Terry, > > I have a rather large database as well (> 2 Meg of tuples). I thought > my system was souped up enough: PII/400 MHz (100 MHz bus) 256 Meg SDRAM, > 18 Gig SCSI harddrive, Red Hat Linux 5.1. However, my swap space (512 > Meg) is on the same harddrive as the database (albeit on a separate > partition). It sounds like you are saying that this is a no-no. Just that under heavy loads it may degrade performance as you yourself mention. > The database runs quite fast except with processes involving repetitive > inserts or updates. With each successive update in a continuous process, > the speed drops (almost like an exponentially decreasing process). Plus, > when this happens, I can't really use the computer that runs the > database because it is soooooo slow. When I run top, the computer is > using all 256 Meg of memory and going about 30-40 meg into swap space. > >From what you've suggested, this 30-40 meg of swap is also competing > with the database trying to write to the harddrive (since they are using > the same head). This is the type of performance degradation I was referring to. > If I put in a second drive exclusively for the swap space, could this > increase my speed? Or, would it be better to invest in more RAM so that > the job wouldn't need to use any swap space at all? Why not both? :-) > Thanks. > -Tony > Terry Mackintosh <terry@terrym.com> http://www.terrym.com sysadmin/owner Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed. Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3, PHP 3, PostgreSQL 6.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Success Is A Choice ... book by Rick Patino, get it, read it!
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: