Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
От | Terry Mackintosh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.981014130857.14397B-100000@terry1.acun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? ("Jeff Hoffmann" <jeff@remapcorp.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Jeff Hoffmann wrote: > >Hi, my 2 cents... > > > >I agree completely, LIMIT would be VERY usefull in web based apps, which > >is all I run. It does not matter to me if it is not part of a formal > >standard. The idea is so common that it is a defacto standard. > > i'm not familiar with mysql and using "LIMIT" but wouldn't this same effect > be achieved by declaring a cursor and fetching however many records in the > cursor? it's a very noticeable improvement when you only want the first 20 > out of 500 in a 200k record database, at least. Yes, while this is an improvement, it still has to do the entire query, would be nice if the query could be terminated after a designated number of rows where found, thus freeing system resources that are other wise consumed. I have seen web users run ridculous querys, like search for the letter 'a', and it happens to be a substring search, now the box go'es ape shit for 5 or 10 min.s while it basically gets the whole db as the search result. All this befor you can do a 'FETCH', as I understand FETCH, I will need to read up on it. Note that I do not have any databases that larg on my box, I was thinking back to my VFP/NT experiances. Have a great day Terry Mackintosh <terry@terrym.com> http://www.terrym.com sysadmin/owner Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed. Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3, PHP 3, PostgreSQL 6.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Success Is A Choice ... book by Rick Patino, get it, read it!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: