Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y
От | Bruce Tong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980724161824.31137B-100000@laxmi.ev.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]y (dg@illustra.com (David Gould)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Okay, I've suspected there was more to "template1" for a little while now, > > > but I'd not gotten around to looking into it more. Still, my first > > > impression was it was a sample database. ;) Maybe a name like "master" > > > would be clearer, or maybe that means something else to someone. > > > > Yes, master would be a better name than template1. > > I disagree. template1 is not only the "master" database, it is also used as > as the template when creating a new database. That is, if you want to create > all your databases with certain characteristics (say installed functions or > types or something) you can set up template1 the way you want, dump it to > the template dump file and then any new db will be created with your > customization. So template1 really is a discriptive term. Really? Neat. Okay, its descriptive. Did I miss this in the docs or forget it? I think this should be mentioned at an appropriate place in the beginning of the docs. Such as when discussing how to create a database. Bruce Tong | Got me an office; I'm there late at night. Systems Programmer | Just send me e-mail, maybe I'll write. Electronic Vision / FITNE | zztong@laxmi.ev.net | -- Joe Walsh for the 21st Century
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: